1. PFAS Restriction Proposal: Major Step Forward
β’ RAC Position: the EU-wide restriction of thousands of PFAS based on their persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) properties.
β’ SEAC Status: Socio-economic analysis is ongoing. Final opinion expected by end of 2025.
π Implications:
β’ Broad restriction likely by 2026.
β’ Affects textiles, food packaging, automotive, medical, electronics, and more.
β Action for Industry:
β’ Begin PFAS substitution planning and supply chain impact assessments.
β’ Engage with suppliers about PFAS-free alternatives.
2. Bisphenol A (BPA) β Binding OEL Recommended
β’ RAC Recommendation: Introduced a binding occupational exposure limit (OEL) for BPA, based on its endocrine-disrupting and reproductive toxicity.
β’ Next Step: Feed into updates under the Chemical Agents Directive (CAD).
π Implications:
β’ Industries using BPA (plastics, coatings, electronics) must prepare for airborne exposure limits in workplaces.
β Action for Employers:
β’ Evaluate workplace BPA exposure levels.
β’ Plan updates to ventilation, PPE, and training protocols ahead of CAD adoption.
3. CLP Regulation β Harmonised Classification & Labelling (CLH) Updates
β’ Changes Approved:
o New or revised classifications for substances with CMR (carcinogenic, mutagenic, reprotoxic) or environmental toxicity.
o Addition of group classifications for structurally similar substances.
β’ New entries added to Annex VI of CLP Regulation.
π Implications:
β’ Affects Safety Data Sheets (SDS), product labels, and chemical registration dossiers across the EU.
β Action for Chemical Manufacturers:
β’ Review all products against updated Annex VI classifications.
β’ Update labels, SDSs, and customer communications accordingly.
4. Regulatory Reform: CLP Classification Procedures (Reg. 2025/1222)
β’ Key Changes:
o Group submissions now encouraged for related substances.
o Greater transparency: All proposals must be pre-notified and published.
o Defined timelines: RAC opinions and Commission decisions now subject to clear deadlines.
π Implications:
β’ More predictable classification process.
β’ Increased visibility of substances under regulatory review.
β Action for Stakeholders:
β’ Track classification proposals early.
β’ Engage during public comment periods.
β’ Prepare compliance updates ahead of legal changes.
|
References:
ECHA β June 2025 RAC & SEAC Meeting HighlightsEUR-Lex β CLP Procedure Reform Regulation (EU) 2025/1222
Reach out to our regulation experts on chemical and product regulatory compliances
































